Policy or Politics is a blog composed and posted by HASC’s
advocacy team. Check back soon for insights into issues
affecting Southern California hospitals and health systems.
Susan Harrington is executive director of Communities Lifting Communities — the HASC initiative aimed at health disparities and upstream factors affecting diabetes, preterm births and other public health challenges.
She recently sat down with the HASC Strategic Communications team to discuss the initiative’s goals and work.
Most of us can recall being an intern — and the struggle of
clocking those needed clinical or experiential hours to obtain a
degree.
Students facing challenges with paying for school and training
are often eligible for financial aid and grants through state and
federal programs. In addition, when students complete their
training and become licensed, they frequently become employees of
the training host — and often with loan forgiveness programs and
tuition reimbursement should the student wish to further his or
her education and training.
With the California Hospital Association, the Hospital
Association of Southern California backs state ballot
Proposition 52, which would extend a hospital fee program
that draws state matching funds to support Medi-Cal
services. Tested. Tried. True. Vote Yes on Prop. 52.
The associations also endorse propositions 55 and 56, and oppose
propositions 53 and 64.
Medi-Cal now covers one in three Californians. But do one in
three Californians have access to primary care, preventative care
or anything other than emergent care? Not really.
Simply put – the costs of care are not adequately covered.
Safety-net providers and traditional medical providers, now
taking on an even greater share of the Medi-Cal population, are
struggling to adapt.
The complex world of modern health care cannot have a single
definition of population health.
As the term population health grows in strength and as providers
grapple with how to build networks and deploy services to
implement it, one can’t help but ask, what exactly is population
health?
Early on, it was simply defined as trying to understand the
determinants of health of populations. Now, let’s fast forward to
today’s world of the Triple Aim, rapid system collaboration
models, ACOs and new payment delivery incentives.
Hospital emergency departments are overwhelmed by patients who
cannot get the care they need. And, some patients stay in
hospitals longer than necessary due to the lack of available
providers willing to accept low Medi-Cal reimbursement. Here are
a few facts to chew on:
California law, Welfare and Institutions Code Section 17000, has
required counties to provide health care for the poor since 1933.
Counties have done so in a variety of ways with varying programs
led by county boards of supervisors in partnership with public
health officers. The law requires counties to provide relief and
support, for incompetent, poor, or indigent persons and those
incapacitated by age, disease or accident.
In 1967, California Gov. Ronald Reagan signed into law the
Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) Act, co-authored by Assemblymember
Frank D. Lanterman ( R) and State Senators Nicholas C. Petris (D)
and Alan Short (D). The intent of the LPS Act was to end the
inappropriate lifetime commitment of people with mental illness;
and firmly establish the right to due process in the commitment
process while significantly reducing state institutional expense.
The World Health Organization defines mental health as “a state
of well-being in which every individual realizes his or her own
potential, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work
productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution
to her or his community.”
Imagine you are on the International Space Station and in need of
medical attention – where do you turn? NASA has mitigated the
risk of medical emergencies aboard the space station by using
on-board ultrasound and earth-based telemedicine
consultation. This is not some novel sci-fi concept reserved
for elite astronauts. Rather, a technology occurring at lightning
speed in rural communities across the U.S.
David Lazarus’ column in the Los Angeles Times (June 5)
highlights the complex system of Emergency Department costs of
care, not only in California, but also across the country.
Indeed, it can be confusing and frustrating for patients.
The United States spends more on health care than any other
country. Yet Americans die sooner and experience more illness
than residents in many other countries. Why? And how do we
improve this nation’s health performance? This question has been
studied at great length and the results are frustrating… The
problem is not a matter of large numbers of uninsured or social
and economic disadvantage; and cannot simply be explained away by
the racial and ethnic diversity of the U.S. population.
Beginning this year, the Hospital Acquired Condition (HAC)
Reduction Program, mandated by the Affordable Care Act, requires
CMS to reduce hospital payments by 1 percent for hospitals that
rank among the lowest-performing 25 percent with regard to HACs.
Penalizing hospitals that fall within the worst-performing
quartile, this program is based on measures of adverse events
occurring during hospital stays, such as pressure ulcers,
pulmonary embolisms and certain types of health care associated
conditions.
The financial picture for many hospitals is getting bleaker. Currently more than 50 percent of California’s hospitals lose money on operations and that number is expected to increase without systemic intervention. Medicare and Medi-Cal underpayments remain the biggest part of the overall problem.
There is growing evidence that the role of culture, especially
the culture of patient safety, pays in an organization’s ability
to improve and sustain those improvements over time. Improvement
work is new to many leaders who find themselves in quality roles,
and new improvement teams charged with harm elimination are often
not familiar with the necessary tools to impact change.
The 6.0 magnitude earthquake that rattled Napa County on August
24th served as a good reminder that California is earthquake
country and that we all must be prepared for whatever Mother
Nature sends our way. Only 44% of individuals have a household
emergency plan in place, according to the recent FEMA Personal
Preparedness in America Survey. Americans, myself included, would
much rather plan for vacations, work, social activities and even
a marathon; than prepare for an event that could keep us from
enjoying said activities, our homes and loved ones.
With the August 31 deadline looming, legislators remain focused
on completing pending legislative actions. Lawmakers will now be
focused on passing bills and concurring in amendments. This
period of time is characterized by daily late-night sessions with
legislators sitting through debate on pieces of legislation,
while lobbyists and special interests work feverishly to
influence lawmakers to support or oppose their items of great
importance. Adjournment will depend on how quickly legislators
can work through the hundreds of remaining bills awaiting final
action…
No doubt that many of the 55,000 plus homeless in L.A. County
would concur that living on the streets will make a person sick.
Among 20,000 homeless people surveyed nationally, more than
one in five lives with a chronic health condition alongside a
substance addiction and mental illness. These co-occurring
conditions are then exacerbated by the harsh realities of life on
the streets. Medical respite care – known locally as recuperative
care – is a critical component of the continuum of health care
for people experiencing homelessness.
Here’s a quick recap of events: 2011’s AB 97 reduced Medi-Cal
reimbursement rates for Distinct Part Skilled Nursing Facilities
(DP/SNFs) to rates applicable in the 2008-2009 rate year, less
10%, resulting in effective rate decreases for most facilities of
about 25%. In 2013, the Legislature recognized the devastating
impact these cuts would have and acted to restore the rates on a
prospective basis. However, these essential providers still face
the prospect of retroactive recoupment of millions for services
provided from June 1, 2011 to September 2013.
Stories from media outlets across the nation covering violence
and chaos in our communities have a common thread – timely
intervention and lack of access to appropriate mental health
treatment services for those in crisis. Similarly, I can’t help
but note much of the health policy discussions of late focus on
the same need for increased access to such services. Whether the
issue is wall-time/boarding, emergency department overcrowding or
homelessness – lack of access to appropriate mental health
treatment services in our communities is at the core.
It’s a fact everyone in health care is well aware of—the aging
population is increasing and in the coming years, will
dramatically affect the delivery of health care.
According to the CDC’s The State of Aging & Health in America
2013 report, the growth in the number and proportion of
older adults is unprecedented in the history of the United
States. Two factors—longer life spans and aging baby boomers—will
combine to double the population of Americans aged 65 years or
older during the next 25 years to about 72 million. By 2030,
older adults will account for roughly 20 percent of the U.S.
population.
Earlier this month, the hospital industry, led by the California
Hospital Association (CHA), and the state’s largest union of
hospital workers, SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West (UHW),
signed a breakthrough agreement to form a strategic relationship
set to change the face of health care in California while at the
same time serving as a new national model for how employers and
unions interact.
We hear every day about the challenges hospitals face in this
climate of health care reform. It can be hard in the midst of the
current health care transformation to take a moment to celebrate
hospitals’ victories, but it is important every now and then to
do just that.
It’s been seven years since the passage of AB 2745, which
mandated that the regional hospital associations invite key
stakeholders to planning meetings to improve the post-hospital
transition of homeless patients and then compile the
recommendations into a document. Sadly, the issue of homelessness
and how to handle homeless patients once they leave the hospital
has not gone away. The problem is very much alive and present.
If you or a loved one suddenly needs expert treatment at a
hospital, you need that care now. Not tomorrow. Not next week.
That axiom is even truer with the implementation of the federal
Affordable Care Act. Health care reform has raised expectations,
along with the need to expand access to health care for more than
3 million California residents.
In November 2013, Service Employees International Union-United
Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW) filed two anti-hospital ballot
initiatives. The first initiative would limit not-for-profit
(NFP) hospital/health systems executives’ total compensation
(salary, bonus, pension, etc., excluding health and disability
insurance) to $450,000 per year.
The state Attorney General’s Office is currently reviewing at
least 32 proposed ballot initiatives and you can bet that we will
likely see more than two dozen qualify for the November ballot.
California, where voters cast their opinion via the ballot box,
enacts many laws – some controversial, and the state continues to
allow and promote the initiative and “direct legislation” routes
to address problems being ducked by the legislature.
This question has been top of discussion for the better part of
the past decade. Hospitals across the state (and country for that
matter) have struggled with the difficult challenge of finding
appropriate shelter settings for homeless patients no-longer in
need of acute medical care. The problem has been exacerbated by
graphic media coverage of so-called “patient dumping” on LA’s
Skid Row. I think we all know that these pictures do not
tell the whole story.
The New Year has begun and so has the new legislative session. As
with each new session we anticipate no less than the usual 400
plus bills impacting hospitals and health care delivery…
Several high-priority health care bills are already looming in
the Legislature, dealing with issues such as charity care,
workplace safety and implementation of health care reform.
Here we go again, more attacks on hospitals’ community benefit
programs – first with AB 975 in the legislature earlier this
year, and now, a recent report from the Greenlining Institute
uses faulty assumptions in evaluating hospitals’ community
benefit programs. And during this holiday season of giving, it
seems an opportune time to further counter the thought process of
AB 975 by putting forth our members’ first and foremost mission
of providing quality health care services to residents of their
community.
How can HASC member hospitals play a meaningful role in curbing
non-value added treatments, thereby helping to eliminate some
duplicative costs, wasted services, and clinical complications so
often associated with these treatments?
The American Hospital Association (AHA) recently presented a
five-pronged approach with suggestions on achieving this goal.
Critical steps include:
Enrollment is all the buzz and kudos to the many hospitals and
community partners assisting in the massive outreach efforts
across Southern California. Minimizing the number of
uninsured is everyone’s goal. However, despite massive
enrollment efforts, many will remain without coverage with as
many as six-out-of-10 uninsured residing in Southern California.
Do you know what your hospital is up to? Health care
professionals are coming together; setting aside their
competitive tendencies to help one another improve patient care.
How? Hospitals are helping each other excel in a unique peer
learning format where best practices are shared in critical care,
surgical care, perinatal care and infection prevention. As
a result of this collaboration, in the last three years, more
than 3,500 lives have been saved and $63 million in costs avoided
by hospitals participating in the Patient Safety First (PSF)
Collaboratives.
During the final hours of this year’s legislative session, at
10:50 p.m. on Sept. 12 to be exact, a final vote was taken on a
critical piece of legislation for hospitals in California.
Last week, patients of distinct-part skilled nursing facilities
(DP/SNFs) in rural areas of the state, and their families, were
spared from the loss of access to vital services when an
agreement was reached to prevent proposed cuts to Medi-Cal
reimbursement for those facilities.Had the cuts moved forward,
these very vulnerable patients would have faced the prospect of
having to find care at other skilled nursing centers, located, in
many cases, far from their homes and family support
system. Thankfully for those patients, reasonable minds
reached a compromise to not only avoid the cuts
Subscribe to Policy or Politics?
Suggest a Blog Topic
Let us know what you'd like to read about