Once a year for the past seven years, our community of hospitals
in Southern California comes together to honor the most giving of
themselves, the laborers of the planet. Okay, so we are a
little biased about the people working in our hospitals. Here are
but five of the extraordinary people we honored last week along
with their stories.
Our first award went to a nurse and social worker on the front
lines of a busy hospital who teamed up to fix a problem that
plagues emergency rooms everywhere … frequent fliers.
HASC Executive Vice President Jim Lott was named chairman of
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, an academic
and research institution dedicated to training physicians and
health professionals in providing care to underserved
populations.
In his latest Lott on Health Care blog post, James Lott examines
California AB52, the proposed bill empowering government agencies
to determine health insurance premiums. Read the latest edition
and post your response. Lott on Health Care gives
readers an insider’s perspective of current health policy issues.
Rising health insurance premiums are a concern for consumers and
their medical care givers. Both want to preserve access to high
quality, affordable health care. However, empowering a government
agency to decide what health insurance premiums will be, as
proposed by Assembly Bill 52, is the wrong solution to this very
real problem.
The 2011 Inaugural Inland Empire Quality of Life Summit,
presented by the Inland Empire Economic Partnership, took place
last week with the aim of providing the region with a forum to
discuss the many unique resources, opportunities and successes
within the Inland Empire and to serve as an opportunity for
professionals to teach each other about their respective
industries. Jim Lott, HASC executive vice president, and
Christina Bivona-Tellez, regional vice president of HASC’s Inland
Area Office, spoke to the 500 participants at this summit about
health care issues of concern to the region.
Last November, the director of the state Department of Health
Care Services was “pleased to announce” that the federal
government had approved a new five-year Medicaid Section 1115
waiver for California.
Patients who present in the emergency department (ED) with mental
health issues often encounter long delays before being evaluated
and admitted, transferred, or discharged. Arranging appropriate
evaluation for these patients often disproportionately affects
the operation of the ED, particularly in terms of space and
staffing.
Some hospitals are using telemedicine to help evaluate ED
patients. This report examines seven ED telepsychiatry programs
in terms of their operational structure, financial support, and
the challenges they have encountered. It also looks at the
potential value that telepsychiatry could bring to the efficient
operation of the ED and improved patient care.
The major provisions of the federal health care reform law – the
Affordable Care Act (ACA) – including the expansion of coverage
to the uninsured, start in 2014. In the meantime, the feds have
provided states with the ways and means to get an early start on
providing coverage for some uninsured people using the Medicaid
1115 Waiver process. California applied and received approval to
expand coverage to uninsured legal residents under 65 with
incomes between 0-200 percent of the federally defined poverty
level (FPL). With the help of federal matching funds, this
coverage would be provided by counties until 2014 when the 0-133
percent of FPL population converts to Medi-Cal and the 134-200
percent of FPL population converts to subsidized health coverage
purchased through the state Exchange.
This report describes the major provisions of this Waiver with a
focus on Southern California counties.
There’s been a lot of grumbling from the hospital industry over
the years about SB 1953 (1994) and regulations issued in the
early 2000s mandating the state’s acute care facilities meet
certain seismic standards between 2013 and 2030 or shut
down.
With hospital emergency departments already taxed enough, the
following isn’t reassuring. A new study concludes that the
proportion of outpatient ED charges paid by both government and
private insurers decreased consistently from 1996 through 2004,
undercutting their ability to subsidize care for the uninsured.
Congress may have rejected a public plan option for private
health insurance coverage, but the California Legislature gave it
new life with its passage of legislation to implement the federal
health care reform laws.
In slightly more than 7 years from the posting of this blog
entry, the Hospital Insurance Fund (Part A) for Medicare will go
bankrupt, according to the federal Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS). Why, then, are the Democrats in the U.S.
Senate proposing to expand the program by lowering the age of
eligibility from 65 to 55 years as part of a compromise to secure
passage of its health care reform bill?
Make no mistake about it; the Obama Administration gets it!
Without reform, including cost containment, health care will grow
from 16 percent of our nation’s gross domestic product to 25
percent over the next 15 years.
In the mid-1960s, women comprised less than 9% of the nation’s
medical students. Their ranks nearly tripled within a decade, and
they doubled once again in short order, topping 40% of all
students throughout the 1990s. Earlier in this decade, women
briefly became the majority of all medical students. This shift
is all the more remarkable given the number of medical school
slots in the U.S. has not changed much in the past 30 years while
the number of overall applicants has increased.
According to a recent report by PriceWaterhouseCoopers, few
regions in the United States have the appropriate hospital surge
capacity to cope with a major disaster. Funding on the national
level has been relatively low: “The federal government spends
less than $5 per person annually to pay for health systems and
agencies to be prepared for a disaster. More money is now spent
to stockpile drugs and supplies than to hire and train health
providers to treat disaster victims,” the report states.
We were asked to measure the impact of the closure of King-Harbor
Hospital on the distribution of uninsured patients admitted to
other public and private hospitals. Accordingly, to help
answer this question we engaged the National Health Foundation
(NHF) to analyze hospital discharge data reported by hospitals to
the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD)
and available to the public.
California’s emergency rooms are becoming increasingly crowded
with mentally ill and often disruptive patients, partly the
result of inadequate mental health care and sometimes
injudiciously written “5150 holds.” Acute care facilities lacking
psychiatric beds sometimes have to hold these patients for days,
at significant expense. Medi-Cal reimbursement for psychiatric
patients is inadequate; compensation for uninsured patients is
all but non-existent.
Just months after he was first elected California Governor in
1966, Ronald Reagan and the Legislature enacted a radical reform
of the state’s mental health care system. Rather than warehouse
mental health patients indefinitely in state institutions, they
would be treated in their local communities. As it turned out,
the triumph of these so-called reforms was a cut in state funding
for mental health and the closure of publicly-funded hospitals
for the mentally ill in California.
Since the 1980s California hospitals have been facing the
increasingly difficult challenge of finding appropriate shelter
settings for increasing numbers of homeless patients who are
discharged from acute-care settings. Hospitals have worked and
will continue to work diligently in their communities to solve
this vexing problem.
Our capacity analysis supports the approach in the department’s
(L.A. County DHS) contingency plan for the closure of King-Harbor
Hospital with two critical caveats: (a) We cannot –and we would
argue that no one can– accurately predict or reasonably estimate
where walk-in patients presenting with both urgent and emergency
medical care needs will go; and (b) Unlike county hospitals,
private sector hospitals are prohibited by law from employing
physicians.
After only two weeks in limited release, Michael Moore’s Sicko
achieved the rank of being in the top five documentaries of all
time. That’s too bad, because a documentary it is not. Rather, it
is one long campaign commercial for replacing our pluralistic,
market-driven health care delivery system with a government-run,
single-payer system.
Within a year or two, thousands of retail clinics may be hard-by
the neighborhood Starbucks or nestled inside Targets, Wal-Marts
and major pharmacy chains – as ubiquitous to the 21st century
American shopping experience as pre-washed jeans and organic
produce.
In California, hospital construction is also being spurred by SB
1953, the mandated seismic upgrades to the state’s acute care
facilities that could cost as much as $60 billion to complete. A
recent report by RAND concluded that “only a fraction of
California hospitals will be able to marshal the financial,
organizational and logistical resources to carry out large-scale
construction programs to meet the law’s deadlines.”
Hospital construction bills are being driven upward not only by
the expected red tape, but by a nearly perfect storm of other
factors: high demand for building materials, both in the United
States and developing countries, such as China; experienced
building contractors and subcontractors reluctant to take on the
complexities of healthcare construction; pressure from labor
unions; and a more consumer-friendly bent toward designing
larger, costlier private rooms versus the semi-private rooms of
the past.
Scientists from all over the world came together earlier this
month and in one powerful voice told us that we human beings
broke our planet. They urged us to stop questioning the existence
of global warming and to begin implementing known and proven
strategies to mitigate the problems that a 4-to-5 point rise in
worldwide climate temperatures in the near-term will cause.
Hopefully, world leaders will listen and begin to do the real
work needed to sustain life on earth.
We need a similar reality check with regard to reforming our
health care delivery system in California and the U.S. Our system
neither provides for the efficient access to health care that 6.5
million uninsured Californians or 47 million uninsured Americans
need, nor is it able to sustain the twice-to-thrice annual health
care cost growth to overall inflation ratio that will soon
cripple our ability to do much about improving access for
anybody.
Legislators and governors in many states intend to shepherd some
form of health coverage expansion along in the next year. In
California, Governor Schwarzenegger has introduced an ambitious
plan that would make insurance coverage mandatory. Fees would be
imposed on physicians, hospitals and businesses to help expand
coverage, while low-income and uninsured individuals would
receive subsidies to purchase insurance.
The race is on! Not since 1992, when President Bill Clinton
turned over the task of building a universal health plan for all
Americans to Hillary, has anyone in the know felt that a major
health care access and restructuring plan was forthcoming. Given
the results of last month’s election, though, once again the
pundits believe that real change is coming.
“Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It’s the transition that’s
troublesome.” —Isaac Asimov
Of all the accomplishments achieved by Americans in the past
century, one of the most dazzling has been the prolonging of the
lifespan. In 1900, Americans lived 47 years on average. A healthy
70-year-old today is projected to live to the age of 84.
Though it is the association’s policy not to comment on criminal
investigations, “we are dismayed by the City Attorney’s decision
to use his prosecutorial authority against hospitals to address
the problem of homelessness,” said Jim Lott, Executive Vice
President. “It seems to be a rather excessive, pernicious
approach to solving a problem that hospitals have agreed needs to
be addressed and are addressing,” Lott continued.
Though no statistics are kept on the numbers of homeless treated
by hospitals, 76 hospitals with emergency rooms are the medical
safety net for the estimated 80,000 homeless residing in the
county, including the almost 1,200 who congregate on the streets
of Skid Row in downtown Los Angeles. In fact, these hospitals are
required by law to receive, treat and stabilize any of the
County’s almost 3 million uninsured residents who present with
life-threatening illnesses or injuries, and they meet this
obligation at a collective financial loss of approximately $1.6
billion annually.
In most economic markets, supply and demand are the principle
economic forces at play. This is a bit more complex in the U.S.
health care market, where the economic forces driving health care
are supply, demand, fear and greed.
Move over, 007. You’re not the only one who has a license to
kill. We allow the tobacco industry to spend about $29,000 each
and every minute of the day to market the only consumer product
proven to kill more than half of its regular users. Smoking is
responsible for 90 percent of all lung cancer, 75 percent of
chronic bronchitis and emphysema, and 25 percent of ischemic
heart disease cases. These facts are not refuted by cigarette
manufacturers. “Yes, we agree that smoking cigarettes, including
our brands, causes lung cancer and other serious diseases in
smokers,” Thomas Dubois, Director, Corporate Affairs, Phillip
Morris Australia, reportedly said in 2002. Tobacco use causes 8.8
percent of all global deaths and 4.2 percent of disability.
“To achieve great things, two things are needed: a plan, and not
quite enough time,” once said the late Leonard Bernstein,
renowned composer and orchestra conductor.
The national nursing shortage is well documented and has been
felt acutely throughout our country’s hospitals. What is
especially troubling is that if nothing is done to remedy the
problem, the national supply of registered nurses will remain
virtually unchanged by 2020. In contrast, the demand for nurses
will soar by 2020: the 6 percent shortfall could grow five-fold
to 29 percent.
Emergency department (ED) on-call systems are on the brink of
disaster. Spiraling downward nationally, they fare even worse in
California. It’s a simple problem of supply and demand. Hospital
executives are finding it increasingly more difficult to get
physician specialists (e.g., orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons,
obstetricians, general surgeons and others) to be on call should
their services be needed in the emergency room.
California’s emergency medical services (EMS) system is in
critical condition, most industry analysts would agree. In many
parts of the state, hospital emergency department (ED)
overcrowding, patients leaving without being treated, ambulance
diversion, and paramedic downtimes caused by ED saturation have
reached crisis levels.